The function was published by Weierstrass but, according to lectures and writings by Kronecker and Weierstrass, Riemann seems to have claimed already in 1861 that the function

*f(x)*is not differentiable on a set dense in the reals. However, Ullrich (1997) indicates that there is insufficient evidence to decide whether Riemann actually bothered to give a detailed proof for this claim. du Bois-Reymond (1875) stated without proof that every interval of

*f*contains points at which

*f*does not have a finite derivative, and Hardy (1916) proved that it does not have a finite derivative at any irrational and some of the rational points. Gerver (1970) and Smith (1972) subsequently proved that

*f*has a finite derivative (namely, 1/2) at the set of points x = ${2A+1}/{2B+1}$ where A and B are integers. Gerver (1971) then proved that

*f*is not differentiable at any point of the form ${2A}/{2B+1}$ or ${2A+1}/{2B}$. Together with the result of Hardy that

*f*is not differentiable at any irrational value, this completely solved the problem of the differentiability of

*f*.

Since then, a number of mathematicians have developed examples of nowhere continuous, differentiable (CND) functions and it has been shown that these types of functions are the norm (PDF).

One thing that should be obvious is that these functions are not lines in the geometric sense. These are all limits of other continuous functions, that are mostly differentiable, which converge to a nowhere differentiable function.

In Euclidean geometry, a polygon (or straight line) should only be drawn by pencil and straighthedge. If we were to draw any line, then the straighthedge can be omitted and a person only needs to trace the pencil from the starting point to the finish using whatever path they like. Assuming that the person isn't drunk, the line should be of finite length since we are drawing a line fron start to finish. Thus, any line segment that is a subset of that line, must have an even smaller finite length.

However, with CND functions, if you are to pick a point with a pencil and try to trace it to any other point, you will not go anywhere. The reason being is that the standard definition of a line is not met with the CND function. Since at any point, the function is not differentiable, the line would not know which direction to take. Thus, it would appear to vibrate like an electron held motionless in place.

Therein lies the beauty of such functions. They exist and are continuous, but are not real in the geometric sense.

## No comments:

Post a Comment